species: maintain biodiversity in ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents endangered species
Weight: 0.76
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.78
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.75
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
maintain biodiversity in ecosystem 1.00
change ecosystems 0.89
be important to ecosystem 0.89
threaten biodiversity 0.89
be important for ecosystem 0.88
be threat to biodiversity 0.88
be related to concept of biodiversity 0.87
be vital to ecosystem 0.87
be in ocean ecosystem 0.86
be harmful to ecosystem 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(peregrine falcon, be important to ecosystem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(peregrine falcon, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, be important to ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(species, change ecosystems)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(species, change ecosystems)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(species, be related to concept of biodiversity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, be vital to ecosystem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(species, change ecosystems)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(species, change ecosystems)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(species, be related to concept of biodiversity)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(species, be vital to ecosystem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(species, be related to concept of biodiversity)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(species, be vital to ecosystem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(species, be related to concept of biodiversity)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(species, be vital to ecosystem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, be important to ecosystem)