species: be vital to ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents endangered species
Weight: 0.76
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.78
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.75
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vital to ecosystem 1.00
be important to ecosystem 0.96
be important for ecosystem 0.96
be critical to survival of ecosystem 0.90
be harmful to ecosystem 0.89
be in ocean ecosystem 0.87
maintain biodiversity in ecosystem 0.87
be in southern ocean ecosystem 0.84
change ecosystems 0.82
succesfully coexist in natural ecosystem 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(peregrine falcon, be important to ecosystem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(peregrine falcon, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, be important to ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(species, be vital to ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(species, change ecosystems)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(species, change ecosystems)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(species, change ecosystems)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(species, succesfully coexist in natural ecosystem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(species, succesfully coexist in natural ecosystem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(species, succesfully coexist in natural ecosystem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(species, succesfully coexist in natural ecosystem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(species, change ecosystems)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, be vital to ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(species, be vital to ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, be vital to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, be important to ecosystem)