species: be critical to survival of ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents endangered species
Weight: 0.76
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.78
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.75
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
be critical to survival of ecosystem 1.00
be vital to ecosystem 0.90
be important for ecosystem 0.89
be important to ecosystem 0.89
be harmful to ecosystem 0.84
maintain biodiversity in ecosystem 0.83
be in ocean ecosystem 0.82
change ecosystems 0.80
be in southern ocean ecosystem 0.79
succesfully coexist in natural ecosystem 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(peregrine falcon, be important to ecosystem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(peregrine falcon, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, be important to ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(species, be vital to ecosystem)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(species, be vital to ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(species, be vital to ecosystem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(species, change ecosystems)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(species, change ecosystems)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(species, change ecosystems)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(species, succesfully coexist in natural ecosystem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(species, succesfully coexist in natural ecosystem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(species, succesfully coexist in natural ecosystem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, be vital to ecosystem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(species, maintain biodiversity in ecosystem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(species, succesfully coexist in natural ecosystem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(species, change ecosystems)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(species, be critical to survival of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, be important to ecosystem)