species: need protected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents endangered species
Weight: 0.76
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings chinook salmon
Weight: 0.78
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.78
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
need protected 1.00
be protected 0.96
is protected 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(species, need protected)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(endangered species, be protected)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(species, need protected)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(characteristic, is protected)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(species, need protected)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(endangered species, is protected)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(species, need protected)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(endangered species, is protected)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(endangered species, be protected)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(characteristic, is protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, is protected)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, is protected)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be protected)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(species, need protected)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(endangered species, be protected)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(species, need protected)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(characteristic, is protected)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(species, need protected)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(endangered species, is protected)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(species, need protected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(species, need protected)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(species, be protected)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(species, is protected)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(species, is protected)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(species, be protected)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(species, is protected)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(species, is protected)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(species, be protected)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(species, be protected)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(species, need protected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(species, need protected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(endangered species, need protected)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(endangered species, is protected)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(endangered species, be protected)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(characteristic, is protected)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(endangered species, need protected)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(endangered species, is protected)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(endangered species, be protected)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(characteristic, is protected)