endangered species: need protected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, wildlife
Weight: 0.62
, conservation
Weight: 0.62
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.58
Siblings humpback whale
Weight: 0.75
, bald eagle
Weight: 0.71
, sperm whale
Weight: 0.70
, giant panda
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
need protected 1.00
be protected 0.96
is protected 0.96
need protection 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(endangered species, need protected)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(species, be protected)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(endangered species, need protected)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(biodiversity, be protected)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(endangered species, need protected)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(species, is protected)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(endangered species, need protected)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(species, is protected)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be protected)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(species, be protected)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(species, need protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be protected)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(species, be protected)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(species, is protected)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(species, need protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be protected)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(humpback whale, is protected)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, need protection)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, is protected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(species, be protected)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(biodiversity, be protected)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(species, is protected)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(endangered species, need protected)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(bald eagle, is protected)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, is protected)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(humpback whale, is protected)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(humpback whale, is protected)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(giant panda, be protected)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be protected)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(bald eagle, need protection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, need protection)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(endangered species, need protected)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be protected)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, is protected)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(endangered species, is protected)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protection)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(endangered species, need protection)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(endangered species, is protected)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(endangered species, be protected)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(endangered species, is protected)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(endangered species, be protected)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(endangered species, be protected)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(endangered species, need protection)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(endangered species, need protection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(endangered species, need protected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(species, is protected)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(species, be protected)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(species, need protected)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be protected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(bald eagle, is protected)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(giant panda, be protected)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(humpback whale, is protected)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bald eagle, need protection)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(species, is protected)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(species, be protected)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(species, need protected)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(endangered species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be protected)