endangered species: need protection

Related concepts

Parents	species Weight: 0.65 , creature Weight: 0.63 , wildlife Weight: 0.62 , conservation Weight: 0.62 , biodiversity Weight: 0.58
Siblings	humpback whale Weight: 0.75 , bald eagle Weight: 0.71 , sperm whale Weight: 0.70 , giant panda Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property	Similarity
need protection	1.00
need protected	0.86
is protected	0.80
be protected	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(species, need protected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(endangered species, need protection)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(species, is protected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(endangered species, need protection)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(species, be protected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(endangered species, need protection)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(biodiversity, be protected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(endangered species, need protection)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(species, is protected)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be protected)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(species, be protected)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(species, need protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be protected)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(species, be protected)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(species, is protected)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(species, need protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be protected)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, need protection)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(humpback whale, is protected)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, is protected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(species, need protected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(endangered species, need protection)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(species, is protected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(endangered species, need protection)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(species, be protected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(endangered species, need protection)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(biodiversity, be protected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(endangered species, need protection)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(bald eagle, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(bald eagle, need protection)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(bald eagle, is protected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(bald eagle, is protected)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(humpback whale, is protected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(humpback whale, is protected)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(giant panda, be protected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(giant panda, be protected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(endangered species, need protection)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protected)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(endangered species, need protected)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, is protected)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be protected)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(endangered species, is protected)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(endangered species, need protection)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(species, is protected)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(species, be protected)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(species, need protected)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(biodiversity, be protected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(bald eagle, is protected)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(giant panda, be protected)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(humpback whale, is protected)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(bald eagle, need protection)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(species, is protected)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(species, be protected)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(species, need protected)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(endangered species, need protection) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(biodiversity, be protected)