speech: is prior writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tone
Weight: 0.64
, statement
Weight: 0.61
, act
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sermon
Weight: 0.62
, address
Weight: 0.61
, lisp
Weight: 0.49
, soliloquy
Weight: 0.38
, remark
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is prior writing 1.00
is writing 0.86
writing 0.86
be more important writing 0.83
writing process 0.83
be important in business writing 0.82
writing matter 0.81
was written 0.78
is written 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tone, be important in business writing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(speech, is prior writing)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(act, writing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(speech, is prior writing)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(act, writing matter)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(speech, is prior writing)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(act, was written)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(speech, is prior writing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(act, writing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(act, writing matter)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(act, was written)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tone, be important in business writing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(act, writing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(act, writing matter)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(act, was written)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tone, be important in business writing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tone, be important in business writing)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(speech, is prior writing)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(act, writing)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(speech, is prior writing)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(act, writing matter)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(speech, is prior writing)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(act, was written)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(speech, is prior writing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(speech, is prior writing)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(speech, is writing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(speech, is writing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(speech, is writing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(speech, writing process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(speech, is written)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(speech, writing process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(speech, is writing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(speech, writing process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(speech, be more important writing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(speech, be more important writing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(speech, be more important writing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(speech, is written)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, be more important writing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(speech, writing process)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(speech, is written)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, is written)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, is prior writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(speech, is prior writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(act, writing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(act, writing matter)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(act, was written)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tone, be important in business writing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(act, writing)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(act, writing matter)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(act, was written)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(speech, is prior writing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tone, be important in business writing)