spice: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seasoning
Weight: 0.65
, staple
Weight: 0.62
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
, brand
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fennel
Weight: 0.72
, mustard seed
Weight: 0.71
, black pepper
Weight: 0.70
, saffron
Weight: 0.70
, allspice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
has quality worth 0.82
is new good 0.80
go bad 0.79
be good for health 0.77
taste good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(seasoning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(spice, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(spice, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(seasoning, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(seasoning, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(fennel, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(black pepper, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fennel, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fennel, is quality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mustard seed, has quality worth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(saffron, be good for health)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(seasoning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(spice, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(spice, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(fennel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fennel, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fennel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(fennel, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mustard seed, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(mustard seed, has quality worth)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fennel, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fennel, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(black pepper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(black pepper, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(saffron, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(saffron, be good for health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(spice, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(spice, go bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(spice, go bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(spice, go bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(spice, go bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(spice, taste good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(spice, taste good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(spice, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(spice, taste good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(spice, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(spice, taste good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(spice, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(spice, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(seasoning, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fennel, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fennel, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(black pepper, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fennel, is quality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mustard seed, has quality worth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(saffron, be good for health)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(seasoning, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(spice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)