spice: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seasoning
Weight: 0.65
, staple
Weight: 0.62
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
, brand
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fennel
Weight: 0.72
, mustard seed
Weight: 0.71
, black pepper
Weight: 0.70
, saffron
Weight: 0.70
, allspice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
taste different 0.93
taste strong 0.91
change taste 0.90
taste interesting 0.89
change taste of food 0.87
has quality good 0.79
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(brand, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(spice, taste good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(spice, taste good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(seasoning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(spice, taste good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(brand, taste different)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(seasoning, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(brand, taste different)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(seasoning, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(fennel, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(black pepper, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fennel, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(brand, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(spice, taste good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(spice, taste good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(seasoning, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(spice, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(fennel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fennel, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fennel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(fennel, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(black pepper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(black pepper, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(spice, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(spice, change taste of food)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(spice, change taste of food)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(spice, change taste of food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(spice, change taste)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(spice, change taste)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(spice, change taste)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(spice, change taste)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(spice, change taste of food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(spice, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(spice, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(spice, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(spice, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(spice, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(spice, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(spice, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(spice, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(brand, taste different)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(seasoning, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fennel, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fennel, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(black pepper, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(brand, taste different)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(spice, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(seasoning, has quality bad)