spice: is valuable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seasoning
Weight: 0.65
, staple
Weight: 0.62
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
, brand
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fennel
Weight: 0.72
, mustard seed
Weight: 0.71
, black pepper
Weight: 0.70
, saffron
Weight: 0.70
, allspice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
is valuable 1.00
were valuable 0.95
be important to organisation 0.81
were valuable during ages 0.78
were valuable during middle ages 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brand, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(spice, is valuable)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(brand, be important to organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(spice, is valuable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(brand, is valuable)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(brand, be important to organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(brand, is valuable)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(saffron, is valuable)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brand, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(spice, is valuable)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(brand, be important to organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(spice, is valuable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(saffron, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(saffron, is valuable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(spice, is valuable)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(spice, were valuable during middle ages)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(spice, were valuable during middle ages)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(spice, were valuable during middle ages)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(spice, were valuable during middle ages)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(spice, is valuable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(spice, is valuable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(brand, be important to organisation)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(brand, is valuable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(saffron, is valuable)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(brand, is valuable)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(spice, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(brand, be important to organisation)