spice: were important in 1450

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seasoning
Weight: 0.65
, staple
Weight: 0.62
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
, brand
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fennel
Weight: 0.72
, mustard seed
Weight: 0.71
, black pepper
Weight: 0.70
, saffron
Weight: 0.70
, allspice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
were important in 1450 1.00
were important in times 0.89
were important part of life 0.88
were important in history 0.88
be important to organisation 0.87
were valuable 0.84
were expensive during 1300s 0.82
were made 0.82
were valuable during ages 0.79
were important in century 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(brand, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(spice, were important in 1450)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(staple, were made)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(spice, were important in 1450)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(brand, be important to organisation)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(staple, were made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(staple, were made)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to organisation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(brand, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(spice, were important in 1450)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(staple, were made)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(spice, were important in 1450)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(spice, were important in 1450)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(spice, were important in history)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(spice, were important in history)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(spice, were expensive during 1300s)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(spice, were expensive during 1300s)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(spice, were expensive during 1300s)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important in 1450)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(spice, were important in 1450)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(staple, were made)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(brand, be important to organisation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(brand, be important to organisation)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(spice, were important in 1450)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(staple, were made)