splenectomy: increased risk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents treatment
Weight: 0.54
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.52
, surgery
Weight: 0.46
, factor
Weight: 0.41
, chemotherapy
Weight: 0.31
Siblings plastic surgery
Weight: 0.34
, hysterectomy
Weight: 0.34
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.34
, debridement
Weight: 0.33
, nephrectomy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
increased risk 1.00
increase risk of dvt 0.95
increase risk 0.95
increased risk of infection 0.90
be risk for dvt 0.87
is risk 0.87
is risk factor for dvt 0.82
is risk factor 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(surgery, increase risk of dvt)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(splenectomy, increased risk)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(surgery, increase risk)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(splenectomy, increased risk)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(surgery, is risk factor for dvt)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(splenectomy, increased risk)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(surgery, is risk)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(splenectomy, increased risk)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(surgery, is risk factor)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(splenectomy, increased risk)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(surgery, be risk for dvt)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(splenectomy, increased risk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(surgery, increase risk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(surgery, be risk for dvt)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(surgery, increase risk of dvt)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(surgery, is risk)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(surgery, is risk factor)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(surgery, is risk factor for dvt)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(surgery, increase risk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(surgery, increase risk of dvt)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be risk for dvt)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is risk)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is risk factor for dvt)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is risk factor)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, is risk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(surgery, increase risk of dvt)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(splenectomy, increased risk)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(surgery, increase risk)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(splenectomy, increased risk)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(surgery, is risk)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(splenectomy, increased risk)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(surgery, is risk factor for dvt)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(splenectomy, increased risk)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(surgery, be risk for dvt)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(splenectomy, increased risk)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(surgery, is risk factor)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(splenectomy, increased risk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(plastic surgery, is risk)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, is risk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(splenectomy, increased risk)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(splenectomy, increased risk of infection)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(splenectomy, increased risk of infection)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk of infection)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(splenectomy, increased risk of infection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(splenectomy, increased risk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(surgery, increase risk)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(surgery, increase risk of dvt)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(surgery, is risk factor)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(surgery, be risk for dvt)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(surgery, is risk)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(surgery, is risk factor for dvt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, is risk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(surgery, is risk factor)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(surgery, increase risk)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(surgery, be risk for dvt)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(surgery, is risk)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(surgery, increase risk of dvt)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(splenectomy, increased risk)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(surgery, is risk factor for dvt)