spoiler: be illegal in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents detail
Weight: 0.57
, part
Weight: 0.52
, candidate
Weight: 0.50
, feature
Weight: 0.49
Siblings preview
Weight: 0.31
, heating element
Weight: 0.30
, bay window
Weight: 0.29
, wrinkle
Weight: 0.29
, title
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in australia 1.00
be expensive in canada 0.81
is illegal 0.79
be much more expensive in canada 0.77
be cheaper in america 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(part, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(spoiler, be illegal in australia)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(part, be much more expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(spoiler, be illegal in australia)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(part, be cheaper in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(spoiler, be illegal in australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(part, be expensive in canada)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(part, be much more expensive in canada)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(part, be cheaper in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(part, be expensive in canada)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(part, be much more expensive in canada)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(part, be cheaper in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(title, is illegal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(part, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(spoiler, be illegal in australia)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(part, be much more expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(spoiler, be illegal in australia)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(part, be cheaper in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(spoiler, be illegal in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(title, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(title, is illegal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(spoiler, be illegal in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoiler, be illegal in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(spoiler, be illegal in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(part, be expensive in canada)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(part, be much more expensive in canada)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(part, be cheaper in america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(title, is illegal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(part, be expensive in canada)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(part, be cheaper in america)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(spoiler, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(part, be much more expensive in canada)