spoon: be at supermarket

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.74
, spatula
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.62
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.60
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.70
, ladle
Weight: 0.36
, butter knife
Weight: 0.36
, razor blade
Weight: 0.36
, chopstick
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at supermarket 1.00
be at store 0.83
be at in restaurant 0.76
be at restaurant 0.76
be at kitchen supply store 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(kitchen utensil, be at kitchen supply store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spoon, be at supermarket)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spoon, be at supermarket)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(item, be at store)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(kitchen utensil, be at kitchen supply store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(item, be at store)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(kitchen utensil, be at kitchen supply store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(spoon, be at supermarket)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(kitchen utensil, be at kitchen supply store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(spoon, be at supermarket)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(chopstick, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(chopstick, be at restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(spoon, be at supermarket)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(spoon, be at in restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(spoon, be at in restaurant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(spoon, be at in restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at in restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at supermarket)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spoon, be at supermarket)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(kitchen utensil, be at kitchen supply store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(chopstick, be at restaurant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chopstick, be at in restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(spoon, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(kitchen utensil, be at kitchen supply store)