spoon: be at table set

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.74
, spatula
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.62
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.60
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.70
, ladle
Weight: 0.36
, butter knife
Weight: 0.36
, razor blade
Weight: 0.36
, chopstick
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at table set 1.00
be at table 0.90
be at your table 0.87
be at dine table 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(object, be at your table)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(spoon, be at table set)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(object, be at your table)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(object, be at your table)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at table)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at dine table)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(object, be at your table)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(spoon, be at table set)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(chopstick, be at table)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chopstick, be at table)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(chopstick, be at dine table)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(chopstick, be at dine table)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(spoon, be at table set)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(spoon, be at table)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at table)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(spoon, be at table)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(spoon, be at table)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at table set)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(spoon, be at table set)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(object, be at your table)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chopstick, be at table)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chopstick, be at dine table)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(object, be at your table)