springfield: was chosen as capital

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.61
, city
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings richmond
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35
, lancaster
Weight: 0.35
, wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, lexington
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was chosen as capital 1.00
was chosen capital 0.99
was chosen as capital of illinois 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(springfield, was chosen as capital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as capital)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(springfield, was chosen as capital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as capital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(richmond, was chosen as capital)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(springfield, was chosen as capital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(springfield, was chosen as capital)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(springfield, was chosen as capital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(springfield, was chosen capital)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(springfield, was chosen as capital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(springfield, was chosen capital)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(springfield, was chosen as capital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(springfield, was chosen capital)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(springfield, was chosen as capital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(springfield, was chosen as capital of illinois)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(springfield, was chosen as capital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(springfield, was chosen as capital of illinois)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(springfield, was chosen as capital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(springfield, was chosen as capital of illinois)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(springfield, was chosen as capital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(springfield, was chosen capital)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(springfield, was chosen as capital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(springfield, was chosen as capital of illinois)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(springfield, was chosen as capital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(springfield, was chosen as capital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(springfield, was chosen as capital)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(springfield, was chosen as capital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(springfield, was chosen as capital)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(springfield, was chosen as capital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(richmond, was chosen as capital)