squirrel: be in uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents predator
Weight: 0.71
, wild animal
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.68
, creature
Weight: 0.68
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, owl
Weight: 0.38
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, fox
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in uk 1.00
be endangered in uk 0.89
decline in uk 0.86
were introduced into uk 0.85
be massive in canada 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, decline in uk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, be endangered in uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(red squirrel, be endangered in uk)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, be endangered in uk)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, decline in uk)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, decline in uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(squirrel, be in uk)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(squirrel, be endangered in uk)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(squirrel, decline in uk)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(squirrel, were introduced into uk)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(squirrel, be massive in canada)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(squirrel, be massive in canada)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(squirrel, be massive in canada)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be massive in canada)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(squirrel, decline in uk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(squirrel, decline in uk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(squirrel, were introduced into uk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(squirrel, were introduced into uk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, decline in uk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(squirrel, be endangered in uk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, were introduced into uk)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(squirrel, be endangered in uk)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be endangered in uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be in uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(squirrel, be in uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(red squirrel, decline in uk)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(red squirrel, be endangered in uk)