squirrel: has physical part tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents predator
Weight: 0.71
, wild animal
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.68
, creature
Weight: 0.68
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, owl
Weight: 0.38
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, fox
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tails 1.00
have big tails 0.89
need tails 0.89
has physical part tail 0.89
have white tails 0.88
have red tails 0.87
put up tails 0.86
lose tails 0.86
have diverse tails 0.83
have fluffy tails 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(raccoon, has physical part tails)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, have white tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(raccoon, has physical part tail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(red squirrel, have white tails)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, have white tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(raccoon, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(raccoon, has physical part tails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(raccoon, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(raccoon, has physical part tail)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fox, have big tails)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have big tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(squirrel, has physical part tails)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(squirrel, have fluffy tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(squirrel, have fluffy tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, have fluffy tails)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(squirrel, have fluffy tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(squirrel, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(raccoon, has physical part tails)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(red squirrel, have white tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(raccoon, has physical part tail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have big tails)