red squirrel: has physical part tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.72
, bird
Weight: 0.71
, mammal
Weight: 0.69
, rodent
Weight: 0.66
, animal
Weight: 0.66
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.40
, squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, blue bird
Weight: 0.39
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, fox
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tails 1.00
have white tails 0.88
have bushy tails 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, have bushy tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(squirrel, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(squirrel, have bushy tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, have white tails)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(red squirrel, have white tails)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, have white tails)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(red squirrel, have white tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(red squirrel, have bushy tails)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, have bushy tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(red squirrel, have bushy tails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, have bushy tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(squirrel, have bushy tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)