red fox: has physical part tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tails 1.00
have long tails 0.90
have big tails 0.89
has physical part tail 0.89
has physical part legs 0.85
has physical part claws 0.83
has physical part whiskers 0.82
has physical part teeth 0.82
has physical part noses 0.81
has physical part ears 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have long tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have big tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big tails)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, have long tails)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(red panda, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(red panda, have long tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part tails)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big tails)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(red fox, have big tails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(red fox, have long tails)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(red fox, have big tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fox, have long tails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have big tails)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(red panda, have long tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fox, have long tails)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have big tails)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)