arctic fox: have big tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wildlife
Weight: 0.74
, polar bear
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.71
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.71
, fox
Weight: 0.39
, snowy owl
Weight: 0.38
, squirrel
Weight: 0.38
, gray fox
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big tails 1.00
has physical part tails 0.89
have big bushy tails 0.86
have bushy tails 0.81
have big back feet 0.78
has physical part tail 0.78
have big feet 0.77
have smaller ears than other foxes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(polar bear, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have big feet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have big feet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, have bushy tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(polar bear, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have big tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(red fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(squirrel, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(squirrel, have bushy tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have big tails)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big bushy tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big bushy tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big back feet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big feet)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have smaller ears than other foxes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big feet)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have big back feet)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big back feet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big feet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big bushy tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have smaller ears than other foxes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have smaller ears than other foxes)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have big feet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have big bushy tails)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have smaller ears than other foxes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(polar bear, have big feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(red fox, have big tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have big tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(squirrel, have bushy tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(polar bear, have big feet)