arctic fox: have big back feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wildlife
Weight: 0.74
, polar bear
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.71
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.71
, fox
Weight: 0.39
, snowy owl
Weight: 0.38
, squirrel
Weight: 0.38
, gray fox
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big back feet 1.00
have big feet 0.97
have back feet 0.96
has physical part feet 0.86
have thick foot pads 0.79
have foot pads 0.78
have big tails 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(polar bear, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big back feet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have big feet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have big feet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(polar bear, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big back feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part feet)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have big tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(red fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have big back feet)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have back feet)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have back feet)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big feet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have back feet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big feet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big feet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have foot pads)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have foot pads)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have foot pads)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have big feet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have foot pads)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have back feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big back feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(polar bear, have big feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part feet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(red fox, have big tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have big tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(arctic fox, have big back feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(polar bear, have big feet)