fox: has physical part feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part feet 1.00
have small feet 0.86
have black feet 0.85
have small black feet 0.81
has physical part tail 0.79
has physical part ears 0.78
has physical part tails 0.78
has physical part whiskers 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part feet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have black feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tail)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red fox, have black feet)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part tail)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(fox, has physical part feet)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fox, have black feet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(fox, has physical part ears)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fox, have small black feet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(fox, has physical part tail)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(fox, has physical part tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(fox, have black feet)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(fox, have black feet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fox, have small black feet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fox, have black feet)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fox, have small black feet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fox, have small black feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(red fox, have black feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part tail)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)