red fox: have black feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have black feet 1.00
has physical part feet 0.85
has color black 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(red fox, have black feet)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(red fox, have black feet)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(red fox, have black feet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part feet)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(fox, have black feet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fox, have black feet)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has color black)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red fox, have black feet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red fox, have black feet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red fox, have black feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(red squirrel, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, has color black)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(red fox, have black feet)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red fox, has color black)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(red fox, has color black)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has color black)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(red fox, has color black)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have black feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(red fox, have black feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fox, have black feet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has color black)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fox, have black feet)