fox: has physical part ears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part ears 1.00
have long ears 0.90
have big ears 0.89
have small ears 0.87
has physical part tails 0.81
has physical part whiskers 0.81
has physical part tail 0.80
has physical part feet 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(man, have big ears)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(man, have big ears)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have small ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have big ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have small ears)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have small ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, have small ears)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big ears)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part tail)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, have big ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(fox, has physical part ears)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fox, have small ears)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(fox, have small ears)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(fox, have small ears)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(fox, have big ears)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fox, have small ears)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part feet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(fox, has physical part tail)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fox, have big ears)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fox, have big ears)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(fox, has physical part tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part feet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(fox, has physical part feet)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, have big ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have small ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, have small ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(red fox, have big ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, have big ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part tail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, have big ears)