fox: have big ears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big ears 1.00
have small ears 0.94
have long ears 0.93
has physical part ears 0.89
have big tails 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fox, have big ears)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(man, have big ears)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(man, have big ears)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big ears)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have big ears)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have small ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fox, have big ears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have small ears)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big ears)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have small ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, have small ears)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, have big ears)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(red fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(fox, have big ears)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(fox, have small ears)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(fox, have small ears)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fox, have small ears)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fox, have small ears)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(fox, has physical part ears)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have big tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have big tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big tails)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(fox, have big tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fox, have big ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, have big ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have small ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(red fox, have big ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, have small ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, have big ears)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(red fox, have big tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, have big ears)