arctic fox: have small ears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wildlife
Weight: 0.74
, polar bear
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.71
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.71
, fox
Weight: 0.39
, snowy owl
Weight: 0.38
, squirrel
Weight: 0.38
, gray fox
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have small ears 1.00
has physical part ears 0.87
have smaller ears than other foxes 0.83
have small ones 0.79
has size small 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have small ears)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have small ears)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have small ears)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fox, have small ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(polar bear, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have small ears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(fox, have small ears)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have small ears)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has size small)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has size small)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has size small)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has size small)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have small ones)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ones)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have smaller ears than other foxes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have small ones)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have smaller ears than other foxes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have small ones)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have smaller ears than other foxes)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have smaller ears than other foxes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have small ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(polar bear, have small ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fox, have small ears)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(arctic fox, have small ears)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(polar bear, have small ears)