red fox: have big ears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big ears 1.00
has physical part ears 0.89
have pointy ears 0.85
have big tails 0.80
have long noses 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(red fox, have big ears)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(red fox, have big ears)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(red fox, have big ears)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(red fox, have big ears)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(red fox, have big ears)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fox, have big ears)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have big tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have big ears)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big ears)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big ears)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big ears)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big ears)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big ears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(red panda, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(red panda, have big ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(red fox, have big ears)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, have long noses)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long noses)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(red fox, have big tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(red fox, have long noses)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big tails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big tails)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long noses)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(red fox, have big tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big ears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(red fox, have big ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fox, have big ears)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have big tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(red panda, have big ears)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fox, have big ears)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have big tails)