red panda: has physical part whiskers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents giant panda
Weight: 0.80
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, endangered species
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, monkey
Weight: 0.60
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, red fox
Weight: 0.38
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part whiskers 1.00
has physical part tails 0.82
has physical part paws 0.81
has physical part ears 0.81
has physical part tail 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(monkey, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(monkey, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(monkey, has physical part tail)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tail)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(monkey, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(monkey, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(red panda, has physical part whiskers)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tail)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tail)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tail)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)