red fox: have long tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long tails 1.00
have big tails 0.94
has physical part tails 0.90
have bushy tails 0.82
have long legs 0.82
have long noses 0.80
has physical part tail 0.79
have whiskers on legs 0.77
have bushy tail 0.75
have pointy ears 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have long tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have big tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big tails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, have long tails)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, have bushy tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(red panda, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(red panda, have long tails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(red squirrel, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, have bushy tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(red fox, have long tails)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big tails)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(red fox, have big tails)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(red fox, have long noses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, have long noses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long noses)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(red fox, have long legs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big tails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long noses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(red fox, have big tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long legs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(red fox, have long legs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fox, have long tails)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have big tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(red panda, have long tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(red squirrel, have bushy tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fox, have long tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have big tails)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(red fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, have bushy tails)