red fox: have bushy tail

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bushy tail 1.00
have bushy tails 0.96
have whiskers on legs 0.80
has physical part tail 0.79
has physical part whiskers 0.76
have pointy ears 0.76
have long tails 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have long tails)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have long tails)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, have long tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, have bushy tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have long tails)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(red squirrel, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, have bushy tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(red panda, have long tails)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(red panda, have long tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(red fox, have bushy tail)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(red fox, have long tails)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fox, have long tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(red squirrel, have bushy tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(red panda, have long tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fox, have long tails)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)