red fox: have long legs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long legs 1.00
has physical part legs 0.90
have whiskers on legs 0.85
have long tails 0.82
has physical part tail 0.77
has physical part tails 0.77
have long noses 0.77
has physical part feet 0.76
have big tails 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(red fox, have long legs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(red fox, have long legs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(red fox, have long legs)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(red fox, have long legs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(red fox, have long legs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(red fox, have long legs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(red fox, have long legs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(red fox, have long legs)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(red fox, have long legs)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(red fox, have long legs)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(red fox, have long legs)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(red fox, have long legs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part feet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have long tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have big tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, have long tails)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big tails)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long legs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long legs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long legs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long legs)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long legs)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long legs)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long legs)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long legs)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long legs)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long legs)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long legs)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long legs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(red panda, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(red panda, have long tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(red fox, have long legs)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, have long noses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(red fox, have long noses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long noses)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(red fox, have long tails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(red fox, have big tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long noses)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(red fox, have big tails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(red fox, have long legs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part feet)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fox, have long tails)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have big tails)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(red panda, have long tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part feet)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fox, have long tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(red fox, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have big tails)