starbucks: be out of food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents store
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.63
, company
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.36
, pepsi
Weight: 0.35
, grocery store
Weight: 0.34
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, convenience store
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be out of food 1.00
run out of food 0.93
throw away food 0.81
go out of business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(store, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(starbucks, be out of food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(starbucks, be out of food)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(company, throw away food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(starbucks, be out of food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(store, throw away food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(starbucks, be out of food)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fast food restaurant, throw away food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(starbucks, be out of food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, throw away food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(store, throw away food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(company, throw away food)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(company, go out of business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(store, go out of business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, throw away food)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(store, throw away food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(company, throw away food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(store, go out of business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(company, go out of business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, throw away food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, throw away food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, go out of business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(company, throw away food)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(starbucks, be out of food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(store, throw away food)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(starbucks, be out of food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fast food restaurant, throw away food)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(starbucks, be out of food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(store, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(starbucks, be out of food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(starbucks, be out of food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(grocery store, throw away food)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(grocery store, throw away food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(mcdonalds, throw away food)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, throw away food)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(grocery store, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(grocery store, go out of business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(starbucks, be out of food)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, run out of food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(starbucks, run out of food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(starbucks, run out of food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, throw away food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, go out of business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(starbucks, run out of food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(starbucks, throw away food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(starbucks, go out of business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(starbucks, throw away food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(starbucks, throw away food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(starbucks, go out of business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(starbucks, go out of business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(starbucks, be out of food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, throw away food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(store, throw away food)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(company, throw away food)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(company, go out of business)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(store, go out of business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(grocery store, throw away food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, throw away food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(grocery store, go out of business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, throw away food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(store, throw away food)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(company, throw away food)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(company, go out of business)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(starbucks, be out of food)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(store, go out of business)