statue: be wonder of world

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monument
Weight: 0.75
, object
Weight: 0.65
, idol
Weight: 0.65
, sculpture
Weight: 0.65
, figure
Weight: 0.64
Siblings national monument
Weight: 0.40
, memorial
Weight: 0.37
, obelisk
Weight: 0.37
, museum
Weight: 0.37
, temple
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be wonder of world 1.00
be considered wonder 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(statue, be wonder of world)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(temple, be considered wonder)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(statue, be wonder of world)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(temple, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(temple, be considered wonder)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(statue, be wonder of world)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(statue, be wonder of world)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(statue, be wonder of world)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(statue, be considered wonder)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(statue, be wonder of world)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(statue, be considered wonder)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(statue, be wonder of world)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(statue, be considered wonder)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(statue, be wonder of world)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(statue, be considered wonder)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(statue, be wonder of world)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(statue, be wonder of world)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(statue, be wonder of world)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(statue, be wonder of world)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(statue, be wonder of world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(statue, be wonder of world)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(temple, be considered wonder)