status: be in sompek arena

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, condition
Weight: 0.61
, privilege
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings citizenship
Weight: 0.32
, integrity
Weight: 0.32
, loyalty
Weight: 0.32
, real number
Weight: 0.32
, rank
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in arena 1.00
be in sompek arena 1.00
work in arena 0.97
be in long sompek arena 0.96
be in long arena 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(status, be in sompek arena) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rank, work in arena)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(status, be in sompek arena) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(rank, work in arena) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rank, work in arena)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(status, be in sompek arena) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(status, be in sompek arena)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(status, be in sompek arena) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(status, be in arena)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(status, be in sompek arena) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(status, be in long sompek arena)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(status, be in sompek arena) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(status, be in arena)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(status, be in sompek arena) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(status, be in arena)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(status, be in sompek arena) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(status, be in long sompek arena)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(status, be in sompek arena) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(status, be in sompek arena) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(status, be in sompek arena)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(status, be in sompek arena) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(status, be in sompek arena)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(status, be in sompek arena) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rank, work in arena)