status: is quo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, condition
Weight: 0.61
, privilege
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings citizenship
Weight: 0.32
, integrity
Weight: 0.32
, loyalty
Weight: 0.32
, real number
Weight: 0.32
, rank
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quo 1.00
is quo valuable 0.96
is quo valuable to people 0.95
is quo valuable to wealthy people 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(status, is quo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(status, is quo)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(status, is quo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(status, is quo valuable)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(status, is quo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(status, is quo valuable to people)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(status, is quo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(status, is quo valuable to wealthy people)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(status, is quo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(status, is quo valuable)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(status, is quo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(status, is quo valuable to people)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(status, is quo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(status, is quo valuable to wealthy people)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(status, is quo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(status, is quo valuable to people)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(status, is quo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(status, is quo valuable)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(status, is quo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(status, is quo valuable to wealthy people)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(status, is quo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(status, is quo valuable to people)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(status, is quo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(status, is quo valuable)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(status, is quo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(status, is quo valuable to wealthy people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(status, is quo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(status, is quo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(status, is quo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(status, is quo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(status, is quo)