steak: be called rare

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.74
, entree
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.60
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
Siblings filet
Weight: 0.72
, flank
Weight: 0.43
, fillet
Weight: 0.43
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called rare 1.00
is rare 0.97
is better rare 0.90
eat rare 0.88
be served rare 0.82
be by rarity 0.81
be less rare than common ones 0.81
be cooked rare 0.80
be eaten rare 0.80
be rare medium 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(item, be by rarity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(steak, be called rare)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(steak, be called rare) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(item, be by rarity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(steak, be called rare) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(item, be by rarity)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(item, be by rarity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(steak, be called rare) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(steak, be called rare)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(steak, be called rare) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(steak, be called rare)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(steak, be called rare) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(steak, is better rare)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(steak, be called rare) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(steak, is better rare)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(steak, be called rare) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(steak, eat rare)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(steak, be called rare) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(steak, is rare)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(steak, be called rare) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(steak, is better rare)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(steak, be called rare) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(steak, be called rare) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(steak, be called rare)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(steak, be called rare) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(steak, be called rare)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(steak, be called rare) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(item, be by rarity)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(steak, be called rare) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(item, be by rarity)