steak: eat rare

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.74
, entree
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.60
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
Siblings filet
Weight: 0.72
, flank
Weight: 0.43
, fillet
Weight: 0.43
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat rare 1.00
be eaten rare 0.91
is rare 0.90
be called rare 0.88
is better rare 0.87
be cooked rare 0.87
is 108 rare beef 0.81
be cooked medium rare 0.80
be less rare than common ones 0.79
be less rare than ones 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(steak, eat rare)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(steak, is better rare)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(steak, be eaten rare)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(steak, be eaten rare)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(steak, be eaten rare)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(steak, is better rare)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(steak, is rare)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(steak, be eaten rare)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(steak, be called rare)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(steak, is better rare)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(steak, be cooked rare)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(steak, be called rare)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(steak, is better rare)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(steak, is rare)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(steak, be called rare)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(steak, be called rare)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(steak, be cooked rare)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(steak, is rare)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(steak, is rare)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(steak, be cooked medium rare)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(steak, be cooked medium rare)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(steak, be cooked rare)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(steak, be cooked medium rare)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(steak, be cooked rare)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(steak, be cooked medium rare)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(steak, eat rare)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(steak, eat rare)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(steak, eat rare)