steak: be cooked medium rare

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.74
, entree
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.60
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
Siblings filet
Weight: 0.72
, flank
Weight: 0.43
, fillet
Weight: 0.43
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cooked medium rare 1.00
be cooked rare 0.92
be rare medium 0.91
be rare best medium 0.89
be cooked 0.85
put on cooked pasta 0.81
cooked done 0.80
eat rare 0.80
be eaten rare 0.80
cooked well done 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(steak, be cooked medium rare)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti sauce, put on cooked pasta)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(steak, be cooked medium rare)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(spaghetti sauce, put on cooked pasta)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(spaghetti sauce, put on cooked pasta)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(steak, be cooked medium rare)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(steak, be cooked medium rare)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(steak, be cooked medium rare)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(steak, be cooked)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(steak, be cooked medium rare)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(steak, be cooked)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(steak, be cooked medium rare)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(steak, be cooked rare)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(steak, be cooked medium rare)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(steak, be cooked rare)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(steak, be cooked medium rare)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(steak, be rare best medium)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(steak, be cooked medium rare)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(steak, be cooked medium rare)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(steak, be cooked medium rare)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(steak, be cooked medium rare)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(steak, be cooked medium rare)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(steak, be cooked medium rare)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(spaghetti sauce, put on cooked pasta)