steak: cooked well done

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.74
, entree
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.60
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
Siblings filet
Weight: 0.72
, flank
Weight: 0.43
, fillet
Weight: 0.43
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
cooked well done 1.00
cooked done 0.97
be cooked 0.90
have well done 0.87
is well done 0.87
is fully cooked 0.84
put on cooked pasta 0.84
be cooked rare 0.84
have done 0.83
is done 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti sauce, put on cooked pasta)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(spaghetti sauce, put on cooked pasta) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(spaghetti sauce, put on cooked pasta)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(steak, cooked well done)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(steak, be cooked)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(steak, be cooked)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(steak, is well done)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(steak, have well done)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(steak, be cooked)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(steak, is fully cooked)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(steak, be cooked rare)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(steak, be cooked)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(steak, is fully cooked)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(steak, have well done)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(steak, be cooked rare)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(steak, is well done)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(steak, is fully cooked)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(steak, be cooked rare)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(steak, have well done)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(steak, is well done)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(steak, is fully cooked)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(steak, be cooked rare)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(steak, have well done)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(steak, is well done)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(steak, cooked well done)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(steak, cooked well done)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(steak, cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(spaghetti sauce, put on cooked pasta)