steak: is well done

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.74
, entree
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.60
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
Siblings filet
Weight: 0.72
, flank
Weight: 0.43
, fillet
Weight: 0.43
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is well done 1.00
have well done 0.99
is done 0.92
have done 0.91
cooked well done 0.87
do 0.79
cooked done 0.77
is gone now 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(favorite, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(steak, is well done)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(steak, is well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(favorite, do)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(steak, is well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(favorite, do)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(favorite, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(steak, is well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(steak, is well done)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(steak, is well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(steak, is well done)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(steak, is well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(steak, have well done)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(steak, is well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(steak, have well done)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(steak, is well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(steak, have well done)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(steak, is well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(steak, cooked well done)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(steak, is well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(steak, cooked well done)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(steak, is well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(steak, cooked well done)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(steak, is well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(steak, have well done)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(steak, is well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(steak, cooked well done)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(steak, is well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(steak, is well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(steak, is well done)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(steak, is well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(steak, is well done)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(steak, is well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(favorite, do)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(steak, is well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(favorite, do)