:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(steak, be eaten)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(steak, be eaten)
Similarity expansion
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(steak, be eaten)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(steak, be cooked)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(steak, be eaten)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(steak, be cooked)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(steak, be eaten)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(steak, eat raw)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(steak, be eaten)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(steak, eat raw)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(steak, be eaten)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(steak, eat raw)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(steak, be eaten)
⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(steak, be cooked)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(steak, be eaten)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(steak, eat raw)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(steak, be eaten)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(steak, be cooked)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(steak, be eaten)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(steak, be eaten)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings