steak: go tough

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.74
, entree
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.60
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
Siblings filet
Weight: 0.72
, flank
Weight: 0.43
, fillet
Weight: 0.43
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
go tough 1.00
get tough 0.98
is tough 0.97
go bad 0.83
is hard 0.80
go grey 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(potato salad, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(potato salad, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(steak, go tough)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(steak, is tough)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(steak, is tough)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(steak, is tough)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(steak, get tough)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(steak, get tough)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(steak, get tough)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(steak, get tough)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(steak, is tough)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(steak, is hard)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(steak, is hard)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(steak, is hard)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(steak, is hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(steak, go tough)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(steak, go tough)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(steak, go tough) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(potato salad, go bad)