steak: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.74
, entree
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.60
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
Siblings filet
Weight: 0.72
, flank
Weight: 0.43
, fillet
Weight: 0.43
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality prices 0.78
have well done 0.76
be bad company work for 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(steak, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dish, be bad company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(steak, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dish, be bad company work for)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dish, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dish, be bad company work for)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(steak, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dish, be bad company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(steak, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(potato salad, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(steak, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(steak, has quality better)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(steak, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(steak, has quality better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(steak, has quality better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(steak, have well done)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(steak, have well done)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(steak, have well done)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(steak, have well done)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(steak, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(steak, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(potato salad, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(steak, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work for)