steakhouse: be used to eat meat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, place
Weight: 0.49
, business
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.43
, location
Weight: 0.40
Siblings seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.39
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.39
, deli
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to eat meat 1.00
be used to eat beef 0.92
be used to eat food 0.90
be used to eat steak and potato 0.89
be used to eat to get food 0.88
be used to eat steak 0.88
be used to eat steak in 0.88
be used to eat raviolli 0.88
be used to eat 0.88
be used to eat in 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(place, be used to eat to get food)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(deli, be used to eat)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be used to eat)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(deli, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(deli, be used to eat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be used to eat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat beef)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be used to eat food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be used to eat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat steak and potato)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to get food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be used to eat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(deli, be used to eat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(steakhouse, be used to eat meat)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to get food)