steel wool: is chemical change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.70
, metal
Weight: 0.65
, chemical
Weight: 0.57
, mesh
Weight: 0.57
, cleaner
Weight: 0.55
Siblings steel
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.37
, titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.36
, polyester
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is chemical change 1.00
has quality change 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(chemical, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(steel wool, is chemical change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(steel wool, is chemical change)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(chemical, has quality change)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(steel wool, is chemical change)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chemical, has quality change)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(chemical, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(steel wool, is chemical change)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(steel wool, is chemical change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(steel wool, is chemical change)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(steel wool, is chemical change)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(steel wool, is chemical change)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(steel wool, has quality change)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(steel wool, is chemical change)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(steel wool, has quality change)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(steel wool, is chemical change)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(steel wool, has quality change)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(steel wool, is chemical change)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(steel wool, has quality change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(steel wool, is chemical change)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(steel wool, is chemical change)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(steel wool, is chemical change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(steel wool, is chemical change)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(steel wool, is chemical change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(steel wool, is chemical change)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chemical, has quality change)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(steel wool, is chemical change)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chemical, has quality change)