steel: was more important than iron

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.68
, metal
Weight: 0.67
, commodity
Weight: 0.66
, alloy
Weight: 0.61
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings steel wool
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.37
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.36
, iron ore
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was more important than iron 1.00
be than iron 0.95
be more useful than iron 0.94
be rather than iron 0.92
be important over iron 0.92
be rather than iron used 0.91
be harder than iron 0.91
be stronger than iron 0.91
was perferable to iron 0.90
was perfreable to iron 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(alloy, be harder than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(steel, was more important than iron)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(alloy, be harder than iron)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(alloy, be harder than iron)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(alloy, be harder than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(steel, was more important than iron)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(steel, was more important than iron)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(steel, be than iron)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(steel, be than iron)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(steel, be than iron)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(steel, be than iron)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(steel, be rather than iron)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(steel, be rather than iron)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(steel, be rather than iron)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(steel, be more useful than iron)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(steel, be stronger than iron)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(steel, be rather than iron)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(steel, was perfreable to iron)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(steel, was perferable to iron)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(steel, be stronger than iron)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(steel, be stronger than iron)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(steel, be more useful than iron)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(steel, be more useful than iron)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(steel, be more useful than iron)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(steel, was perfreable to iron)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(steel, was perferable to iron)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(steel, be stronger than iron)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(steel, was perfreable to iron)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(steel, be harder than iron)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(steel, was perferable to iron)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(steel, was perferable to iron)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(steel, was perfreable to iron)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(steel, be important over iron)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(steel, be harder than iron)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(steel, be harder than iron)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(steel, be important over iron)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(steel, be important over iron)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(steel, be harder than iron)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(steel, be important over iron)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(steel, was more important than iron)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(steel, was more important than iron)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(alloy, be harder than iron)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(steel, was more important than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(alloy, be harder than iron)