steel: was perfreable to iron

Property	Similarity
was perferable to iron	1.00
was perfreable to iron	1.00
is iron	0.98
be in iron	0.98
be than iron	0.96
be made from iron	0.94
be important over iron	0.93
be different from iron	0.92
be used instead of iron	0.91
was more important than iron	0.90

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(steel, is iron)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(steel, be than iron)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(steel, be in iron)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.27

Salient(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Salient(steel, be than iron)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(steel, is iron)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(steel, be made from iron)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.27

Salient(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(steel, is iron)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(steel, be in iron)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(steel, be than iron)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.27

Salient(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Salient(steel, be made from iron)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(steel, be than iron)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(steel, be made from iron)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(steel, be used instead of iron)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(steel, be different from iron)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(steel, be used instead of iron)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(steel, be made from iron)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(steel, be different from iron)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.27

Salient(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(steel, be used instead of iron)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.27

Salient(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(steel, be different from iron)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(steel, is iron)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.27

Salient(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(steel, be in iron)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Salient(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(steel, was perferable to iron)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(steel, was perferable to iron)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(steel, was perferable to iron)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(steel, be different from iron)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(steel, was perferable to iron)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(steel, be used instead of iron)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(steel, was more important than iron)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(steel, be important over iron)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(steel, be in iron)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(steel, be important over iron)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(steel, be important over iron)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(steel, was more important than iron)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(steel, was more important than iron)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.27

Salient(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(steel, be important over iron)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.27

Salient(steel, was perfreable to iron) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(steel, was more important than iron)

Parents	raw material Weight: 0.68 , metal Weight: 0.67 , commodity Weight: 0.66 , alloy Weight: 0.61 , heavy metal Weight: 0.60
Siblings	steel wool Weight: 0.38 , aluminum Weight: 0.38 , aluminum foil Weight: 0.37 , wood pulp Weight: 0.36 , iron ore Weight: 0.36

steel: was perfreable to iron

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings