stenosis: hurt bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, complication
Weight: 0.55
, abnormality
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.50
Siblings cystic fibrosis
Weight: 0.36
, pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.36
, spondylolisthesis
Weight: 0.36
, aortic aneurysm
Weight: 0.36
, myocardial infarction
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
hurt bad 1.00
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(stenosis, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(stenosis, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(stenosis, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(stenosis, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(stenosis, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(stenosis, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(stenosis, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(stenosis, hurt bad)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(stenosis, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(stenosis, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(stenosis, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(stenosis, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(stenosis, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(stenosis, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(stenosis, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(stenosis, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(stenosis, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(stenosis, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(stenosis, hurt bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(stenosis, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(stenosis, hurt bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(stenosis, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(stenosis, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(stenosis, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)