steve jobs: was successful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.65
, genius
Weight: 0.63
, ceo
Weight: 0.63
, entrepreneur
Weight: 0.63
Siblings steve
Weight: 0.36
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.35
, albert einstein
Weight: 0.34
, alot
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was successful 1.00
is successful 0.97
is successful entrepreneur 0.80
was work important 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(entrepreneur, is successful)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(steve jobs, was successful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(entrepreneur, is successful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(entrepreneur, is successful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(entrepreneur, is successful)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(steve jobs, was successful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is successful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(steve jobs, was successful)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, is successful)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(steve jobs, is successful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, is successful entrepreneur)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, was work important)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(steve jobs, is successful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(steve jobs, is successful entrepreneur)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(steve jobs, was work important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(steve jobs, is successful)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(steve jobs, was work important)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(steve jobs, was work important)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(steve jobs, is successful entrepreneur)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(steve jobs, is successful entrepreneur)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, was successful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(steve jobs, was successful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(entrepreneur, is successful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is successful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(steve jobs, was successful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(entrepreneur, is successful)